Learn

Opposition to the Proposals
Related Resources

The Presidio Trust is considering development plans for the Presidio’s Main Post that would irrevocably change the character of the Presidio. This process is not in the interest of the Presidio or San Francisco and should be rejected.

Superficial Environmental Impact and Planning Process. The Presidio Trust has adopted a fast-track approach to evaluating its development proposals. The planning process for the Lucas development was over three times as long. This project is opposed in various aspects and degrees by almost every local historical organization and neighborhood group, numerous preservation and environmental organizations, and the National Park Service.

Historical Integrity and Landmark Status. Facilities that do not relate to the Presidio does not belong in this national park. Size and scope must be consistent with its natural environment and open setting, as well as the architecture of the Main Post’s existing buildings.

Loss of Recreational Facilities. In a city with scarce open space and limited family-oriented recreational facilities, the removal of a bowling facility and tennis court are unjustified unless for a new facility that serves the historical, natural resources and or recreational values of the main post. Furthermore, the Main Post and surrounding area provide an open, traffic-free area for bicycling, running, and the enjoyment of a park-like environment.

Congestion. At a time of concern about global warming and the carbon footprint of our activities, it is not responsible to propose large new constructions that are projected to attract, with the other Main Post facilities, nearly two million more visitors a year to the Presidio. The vast majority of these visitors will arrive by automobile. Furthermore, there will be demand for new forms of transportation, including tourist buses, delivery trucks, and taxi cabs. BART, the Caltrans station, and the ferries are over three miles away from the Main Post, and Muni is reducing its limited service to this area. The Presidio is not designed on a traffic grid, and the Main Post is a mile away from the nearest entrances.

The Tipping Point. Change can progress slowly before suddenly reaching a critical mass. The results can be unpredictable and can happen quickly. The Disney Family Museum, which is already open on the Main Post, is expected to attract some 350,000 to 400,000 additional visitors a year. A 90-room hotel, and a multiplex theater will produce rapid development that will transform this magnificent national park into an urbanized, high impact “city within a city.” No one wants this ultimate result, but this is what the Presidio Trust seeks to have approved.

Opposition to the Proposals:

Most recent comments include:

National Park Service
April 6, 2009

Advisory Council On Historic Preservation
June 4, 2009

Amy Meyer, Former Presidio Trust Board Member
June 1, 2009

Professor Barbara Voss, Stanford
June 1, 2009

Cow Hollow Association
June 1, 2009

City And County of San Francisco
June 1, 2009

Descendants of Anza and Portola Expeditions
June 1, 2009

Laurel Heights Improvement Association
June 1, 2009

Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier
June 1, 2009

Marina Community Association (Process)
June 1, 2009

Marina Community Association (Environmental)
June 1, 2009

Neighborhood Associations for Presidio Planning
June 1, 2009

National Parks Conservation Association
June 1, 2009

National Trust for Historic Preservation
June 1, 2009

Presidio Historical Association (NEPA)
June 1, 2009

Presidio Historical Association (NHPA)
June 1, 2009

Presidio Neighborhood Representative Work Group
June 1, 2009

San Francisco Architectural Heritage
June 1, 2009

SaveThePresidio.org
June 1, 2009

State Historic Preservation Officer
May 27, 2009

Laurel Heights Improvement Association
May 25, 2009

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
May 24, 2009

Marina Community Association
April 21, 2009

Presidio Historical Association
August 2, 2008

Presidio Heights Residents Association
July 16, 2008

National Trust for Historic Preservation
July 14, 2008

National Parks Conservation Association
July 11, 2008

National Trust for Historic Preservation
July 7, 2008

Sierra Club
July-August 2008

Professor Barbara Voss, Stanford
June 20, 2008

Lawrence Halprin, Architect
June 16, 2008

San Francisco Democratic Party
June 9, 2008

National Trust for Historic Preservation
May 16, 2008

Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods
May 5, 2008

National Park Service
April 4, 2008

Presidio Historical Association
March 26, 2008

Cow Hollow Association
March 12, 2008

Neighborhood Associations for Presidio Planning
February 26, 2008

Related Resources:

Presidio Trust Documents - http://www.presidio.gov/trust/projects/mp/mpdocs.htm

The Presidio Historical Association - http://presidioassociation.org/